Currently, the GHC developers classify all of GHC 9.6.6, 9.8.2 and 9.10.1 as (EDIT) ‘current stable releases’: see Download — The Glasgow Haskell Compiler.
I am not in ‘industry’ but I understand that what ‘industry’ uses is path dependent for each user and, consequently, varies from user to user. That is because moving from one version of GHC to another brings costs (of the change) as well as benefits. I have seen some industry users say that when they move, they can ‘jump over’ some major versions.
The GHCup project weighs up various things when thinking about what GHC version to recommend. For example, see the discussion here: [RFC][GHCup] Should GHC 9.6.4 be 'recommended'?.
At Stackage, currently the most recent LTS uses GHC 9.6.6 and nightly uses GHC 9.8.2: see https://www.stackage.org/. That project tends to avoid the first minor version (sometimes, versions) of a new major version of GHC. I think it waits for users on the ‘cutting edge’ to reveal any bugs from use that are then fixed in later minor versions. A key FAQ is “Why is Stackage LTS still on an older version of GHC?” - see GitHub - commercialhaskell/stackage: Stable Haskell package sets: vetted consistent packages from Hackage.