I commented on that paper here What about having StrictData and non-strict semantics on functions as the default programming style? - #13 by sgraf. TLDR; I don’t think it is of implementational relevance.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
What about having StrictData and non-strict semantics on functions as the default programming style? | 24 | 2399 | September 25, 2023 | |
Deepseq versus "make invalid laziness unrepresentable"
|
30 | 2156 | March 29, 2024 | |
The Haskell Unfolder Episode 31: nothunks | 23 | 1254 | August 23, 2024 | |
MILU and force in Purescipt warning logger
|
4 | 705 | March 26, 2024 | |
Unlifted types vs strict-wrapper
|
17 | 1383 | November 10, 2023 |