# A Joint Statement on Sustainable Stewardship

**URL:** <https://discourse.haskell.org/t/a-joint-statement-on-sustainable-stewardship/13254>\
**Category:** Links\
**Created:** [November 11, 2025, 2:56pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/a-joint-statement-on-sustainable-stewardship/13254 "2025-11-11T14:56:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marcosh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.haskell.org/marcosh/32/436_2.png) [@marcosh](https://discourse.haskell.org/u/marcosh)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2025, 2:56pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/a-joint-statement-on-sustainable-stewardship/13254/1 "2025-11-11T14:56:48Z")

</div>

Recently some public package registries wrote a join statement highlighting the unsustainability of the current model: [Open Infrastructure is Not Free: A Joint Statement on Sustainable Stewardship – Open Source Security Foundation](https://openssf.org/blog/2025/09/23/open-infrastructure-is-not-free-a-joint-statement-on-sustainable-stewardship/).

I was wondering whether it could make sense also for the Haskell Ecosystem to sign the statement and join this effort, or to adopt a similar one to make infrastructure sustainable.