# Fork \`memory\`? As \`memoria\`?

**URL:** <https://discourse.haskell.org/t/fork-memory-as-memoria/11777>\
**Category:** Learn\
**Created:** [April 5, 2025, 7:01pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/fork-memory-as-memoria/11777 "2025-04-05T19:01:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mpilgrem](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.haskell.org/mpilgrem/32/2529_2.png) [@mpilgrem](https://discourse.haskell.org/u/mpilgrem)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2025, 5:30pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/fork-memory-as-memoria/11777/17 "2025-06-21T17:30:14Z")

</div>

@ApothecaLabs, given your comment [here](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/improving-memory-with-better-abstractions/12350/8) are you the somebody else better placed than me (that part is certain, as the maintainer of `botan`!) who might step forward to maintain a fork of `memory` (whatever that fork happens to be named)?

If you are but also wanted a co-maintainer to help with ‘janitor’ work, I would be happy to help out. My own tinkerings around the idea to date are at [GitHub - mpilgrem/memoria: Haskell library for memory and related abstractions](https://github.com/mpilgrem/memoria), in the `main` branch.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/fork-memory-as-memoria/11777)._