# Improving \`memory\` with better abstractions

**URL:** <https://discourse.haskell.org/t/improving-memory-with-better-abstractions/12350>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [June 20, 2025, 10:12pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/improving-memory-with-better-abstractions/12350 "2025-06-20T22:12:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ApothecaLabs](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.haskell.org/apothecalabs/32/3215_2.png) [@ApothecaLabs](https://discourse.haskell.org/u/ApothecaLabs)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2025, 4:43pm UTC](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/improving-memory-with-better-abstractions/12350/8 "2025-06-21T16:43:10Z")

</div>

I would keep the original if I could, but I do not mind forking under a new name. ‘memalloc’ is my current thought, the other thought is to break it up into multiple smaller libraries with distinct intents - eg memory-allocators, memory-pointers, memory-encoding, etc

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.haskell.org/t/improving-memory-with-better-abstractions/12350)._