My talk "Functional Programming: Failed Successfully" is now available!

[atravers]

(yawns)

• Learn you Func Prog on five minute quick! • The Register

  • C++ Monadic interface, JTC1.22.21 Programming Language Library Evolution Working Group

• Why Dysfunctional Programming Matters

  • The [[pure]] attribute, JTC1.22.32 Programming Language Evolution Working Group

• Functional Programming: Failed Successfully

  • Why Functional Programming Should Be the Future of Software Development - IEEE Spectrum

    • Functional Programming: The Biggest Change Since We Killed the Goto? - IEEE Spectrum

  • The Curse of the Excluded Middle: “Mostly functional” programming does not work - ACM

  • Referential transparency fits in your head

  • Mutable Value Semantics Trend vs Immutability

  • Out of the Tar Pit

  • Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? A Functional Style and Its Algebra of Programs

    1. Conventional Programming Languages: Fat and Flabby

    Programming languages appear to be in trouble.
    Each successive language incorporates, with a little
    cleaning up, all the features of its predecessors plus a few
    more. Some languages have manuals exceeding 500
    pages; others cram a complex description into shorter
    manuals by using dense formalisms.