I don’t see how changing release cadence can directly improve your experience then.
Perhaps it would be more worthwhile to designate an LTS release, the maintenance and bug fixes of which have higher priority than even major releases? It doesn’t matter what is the LTS release as long as there is one. a rough guideline could be to produce a minor release within a month of knowing the fix for a certain critical bug, even if there are still fixes for other critical bugs in the pipeline.
Edit: I think that is also in line with what Julian proposed in GHC 9.12.2 is now available - #5 by hasufell.