Controversy surrounding Anduril Industries

Thank you for engaging with almost every single Anduril job post 🫡

6 Likes

Thanks for doing your due diligence with reminding people of what Anduril do, @sclv! While it does suck that feeding their engagement comes at a cost, I agree that it’s necessary to remind people that a job with Anduril directly results in more unnecessary corpses than the average position at <tech job>.

14 Likes

I don’t. And I think most Haskellers will do some proper research before joining any company.

But at least this post isn’t like the average “blockchain is a scam” reply on reddit.

Also glad to see moderation is now making things more civil, so job ad posts aren’t constantly derailed.

11 Likes

I don’t think I’ve had a Haskell job that couldn’t be sniped as unethical by someone. Adtech, crypto, American megacorp, fintech. Maybe defense contractor just takes the cake? Because I never saw people attack those companies so doggedly.

2 Likes

Also, Anduril is like the rare job posting that comes by discourse/reddit that has an actual competitive salary.

Luckily, the companies who post below market salaries get roasted nowadays (on reddit at least).

3 Likes

Personally I don’t care Anduril make weapons, but I also don’t mind people reminding others of that. In particular I’m perfectly fine with what @sclv is posting even if I think in the current world, with crony dictators running >50% of the planet, the manufacture of weapons is a sad necessity and a result of a set of unnecessary circumstances.

I do care about the flakiness in communication which I mentioned in the original thread.

I think the fact Travis showed up, read that comment, and didn’t even respond just additionally proves the point that he just doesn’t know how to do good business. I’d stay away for that reason. Jobs aren’t something where you want a guy just ghosting you and not responding - it’s not serious behavior. Instead Travis spent his visit here with ironic jabs at detractors he has no reason to respond to.

3 Likes

well, turns out Reddit mods don’t want that, because it’s “not nice” and every user on the subreddit has to be a member of the Haskell welcoming committee, so enjoy your salary being in a downward spiral I guess.

1 Like

Ironnicaly, the only effect of that type of discussion is to promote Anduril.

  • Potential candidates receptive to the “more corpses” argument would not take job regardless (at the worst case, they would have left on the first day, realising what there are stepping in).

  • People ready to take the job but who missed the advert, now will see it and can apply.

       Bad publicity is free publicity ...

Thank you for speaking out so diligently over the years, from an “outside of the US” perspective, these days you never know when someone will drop a bomb on you in the name of the free world. Working for the Military Industrial Complex is far from trivial.

7 Likes

Just to add a reference: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext

It appears to be primarily civilians.

It’s also worth noting that US isn’t allowed (according to domestic laws) to ship weapons to countries that violate international law. And it’s also worth noting that countries who do anyway can be held liable for crimes against humanity.

Given the ICJ hasn’t properly ruled on these issues (they just gave a warning/suggestion regarding the west bank), it is indeed an “interesting” situation.

As shocking as that may sound, but a lot of Americans are. And given that you brought politics up, I don’t see how that actually matters, since democrats are currently shipping weapons into “hot” regions.


Although I find the discussion mildly interesting, I’m not too convinced Anduril stands out amongst weapons manufacturers. Is Heckler & Koch better?

5 Likes

From what I gather Anduril is a company that produces weapons; the choice as to where and how to use said weapons is under the sole purview of the federal government of the United States. Unless you have data that points to them try to cross this line, I say this point is very weak and indeed redundant as @nemo mentioned.

Does “militarization” imply anything beyond mere automated surveillance? I don’t see how automating border control is a bad thing in an of itself, countries have to enforce borders regardless.

I can definitely imagine a company run by a bunch of rich kids with loony views where noone takes their job seriously, but I can also imagine a company where that isn’t the case. Having examples of bad practices within the company and/or company’s PR dodging substantive criticism in a childish manner would definitely help.

6 Likes

I think if they’re posting a job here, we’d see similar comments.

6 Likes

scroll up to my post for one.

1 Like

I think this is the crux of the issue. It’s much more interesting for potential candidates to research on US foreign policies than anything else. That will ultimately decide how your work may be put to use.

But that doesn’t seem very specific to Anduril as a company. The posts here however seem to suggest that even for a weapons manufacturer, they are particularly bad.

3 Likes

I think Microsoft Word is a far greater enabler of US military ability than Anduril and Heckler & Koch together. And probably more financially lucrative than them as well.

13 Likes

People can voice their concerns against Microsoft too, I remember there used to be similar comments under any job post of Facebook eg. [job] Work on GHC at Facebook London : haskell

Yeah, those replies are low-effort trashtalk. There’s a difference between dumping your opinion and actually sharing insightful information/thoughts.

2 Likes

I hear if you don’t want people to trash talk your job, you can post on Indeed or pay for an ad :grin:

Or you can enjoy the free advertising on a forum if you have the stuff to handle criticism of your business. I’d say most good businesses can handle that.

5 Likes

You’re not even wrong, but a word processor is a general-purpose tool, so improving it could be seen as a net positive for humanity. It’s more difficult to make that argument for a weapons manufacturer.

10 Likes

I think this argument is as old as time, but you’re aware they’d bring up self-defense, right?

At this point the discussion becomes an ideological one, which makes it anything but insightful.

3 Likes