x-posting my comment here:
Regardless of your opinion on Reddit, it seems to me that permanently shuttering or limiting (eg readonly mode) a subreddit for a big tent community when many users observably wish to go on normally isn’t a responsible usage of your fiat mod powers.
I get the temporary stuff. But making it permanent when plenty of people want to use r/haskell is a different move entirely.
The end result will probably be another subreddit with a worse name (r/haskell2
), which would in turn make the permanent shuttering move equivalent to namesquatting.
So yeah, I don’t think this should be left to a casual Reddit vote. This is a matter of governance, not popularity. If 1/3 of users wish to use Reddit, then it should remain open even if it is not the winner. I don’t have a horse in this race - to me, this is all civics class stuff, on a higher philosophical & ethical plane than what amounts to internet politics. And a civics mindset is especially important when in this type of leadership position.